Dave, I will follow-up with you to find out what you know. However, I would like to be clear about the position the GPWA has taken.
The GPWA itself has never marked a program as being rogue. Our response to rogue programs has always been to suspend their sponsorship and to announce that we have done so, and for the posts where webmasters expose the issues to remain visible for all to see. We have done that with Affiliate Edge.
What we have also done historically, in terms of marking programs rogue, and continue to do, is mark affiliate program listings with their status on Affiliate Guard Dog when they are marked as rogue there. That is part of a long-standing cooperation we have had with Andy at Affiliate Guard Dog. Affiliate Edge is not listed as a sponsor on the GPWA website anymore, so there is no longer any listing on the GPWA site where you can see Affiliate Edge marked as rogue. However, we do run another heavily trafficked site,
iGamingAffiliatePrograms.com. If you take a look at Affiliate Edge's listing on that site, you will see that we have very clearly shown it is marked rogue by Affiliate Guard Dog.
iGamingAffiliatePrograms.com listing for Affiliate Edge
Now I understand the fact that the suspension is currently termed a temporary suspension might be confusing. The reason the sponsorship suspension of Affiliate Edged is termed temporary at the present time is that Affiliate Edge agreed that we should suspend their sponsorship and promised the existing issues would all be fixed and in exchange we agreed that we would provide feedback regarding the issues reported by affiliates and conduct a more thorough investigation of the situation, and also allow enough time to pass before deciding if the suspension would be permanent to see how they behaved with respect to some of the various issues that have been noted by others, and which we are discussing with them.
I agree that it would require a modern-day miracle for affiliate community views to evolve to a place where there was mutual agreement they should be a sponsor here. What I am interested in seeing is whether or not their behavior going forward will paint them as ethical at heart but having been involved in some very bad mistakes in the management transition, or paint them as unethical scoundrels.
I know a very large group of affiliates would argue that the likelihood that the current situation is cause only by some bad mistakes that will be corrected, and not due to unethical behavior, is laughably small. If that is the case we will all see that soon enough. In the meantime I am intent on seeing if Jonathan's older brothers do fix things as I have been promised they will.
Michael