AI agent for affiliates

[gox]

Hi guys, I am planning to invest some time to build AI agent which would help maintenance and keeping the websites up to date. Would this be something what anyone would pay for?

[eenzoo]

What do you mean? The 110th version of a Wordpress managment tool? Like ManageWP?
Or a backlink checker? Or a broken link detector?

[Sherlock]

I would appreciate something that would answer stupid AMs who demand silly things. Like program that makes 35 USD per month demanding a switch to obviously worse landing page. I exchanged 4 polite emails and gave up. They became aggressive.

[universal4]

Although I think Sherlock has a good idea, but I question if it was AI that told the manager they should change the landing pages.


I am looking forward to having AI agent/visitors.

Those that scan the internet and visit all the portals created and maintained by AI.

Isn't it fair that properties run by AI should get AI visitors and properties run by humans get human visitors?

Rick
Universal4

[Sherlock]

People will become retarded for using AI and for not using AI. Offering a casino to sports traffic is mad.

Back to original question. I do not know why anyone should pay for some universal product (sorry universal4), when anyone can do his own tailored product.

[chaumi]

I think the problem is this, OP....

I can see valid theoretical use cases. But that's what I can see. Based on my interpretation of precisely what you mean.

It's what you can see that counts (or may count).

So, to find out if any of this has legs, you're going to need to 1. detail all of the elements you think you'll get covered/need to be covered, 2. build it/test it/prove it works, 3.communicate it.

All the while ensuring that whatever you end up with (and I'm making assumptions here about what you mean) maintains/delivers a suitable degree of originality (note: quote Sherlock " I do not know why anyone should pay for some universal product" At least, I think this is what Sherlock means, I could be mistaken)

So, two problems. You have to do it to find out if anyone is interested/it has true value. Then you have to explain it.

And when you explain it, anyone that knows what they're doing (with AI and/or on other levels) will/can just replicate it themselves (quote "when anyone can do his own tailored product.")

Is all that a reason not to do it?

hmmm, not sure. At the very least, it might pay dividends for the management/maintenance/enhancement of your own site (assuming you run one).

And theoretically (again, assuming you mean what I think you mean), you could get some interest (if it's a very tight "product") from people operating at levels where automated functions do offer some value and financially it makes sense not to try and create a solution in house. How much of a market there is for that type is debatable but I suspect they'd be few and far between.

[gox]

The AI would assist content managers by keeping them informed about updates related to their content. For example, it could notify them when a provider changes existing content, releases new features, or shares new promo codes. Instead of manually checking each provider’s dashboard, the AI would handle that automatically. It would also include a library of assets to help streamline the creation of new reviews.

Goal is really that there is AI which does tedious manual work and content manager uses this as a tool to maintain existing content. To stay relevant always.

[chaumi]

Yeah that incorporates some of the elements I thought you probably meant.

But that could be missing a 100 tricks+ . If the 'tool' is limited to that, it's going to make it easy for anyone to replicate (and personalize) themselves. I think you might need to think broader - identify all of the problems a content/site manager has to handle (but almost always doesn't have time to do it all) and then determine how/if you (can) solve the majority.