Content Length factor

[cryptocasinoscc]

Hi Guys,

I am trying to publish as long posts as I can. Because I have read from many sources that the more you publish, the better it ranks!

Of course, it has to be valuable content and should be all unique.

But I have noticed some well-ranked sites that they have around 500 words of content each post even less.

What do you think about that? Do you have similar observations?

Thanks in advance

Cheers!

[Sherlock]

i am trying to spam as much as i can.

ftfy

[wonderpunter]

ftfy

post style is very similar to GPWA's biggest contributor right? could it be the same?

[cryptocasinoscc]

Who is it mate? I could not get it as a newcomer.

Thanks in advance.

post style is very similar to GPWA's biggest contributor right? could it be the same?

[Sherlock]

post style is very similar to GPWA's biggest contributor right? could it be the same?

I hope so. I hope it is not some infection disease.

[jamesjennifer]

I think Yes, Nowadays content length is very important things.

[Loshario]

Deffinately yes. You should write as much content as possible + backlinks + DA = good result

[RakeAdvisory]

Well, of course this is definitely first thing to do because it depends on yourself. But would be hard to target keywords with KD>5 without a rich backlink profile.

Building backlinks is way harder and according to Google guidelines, it is strictly prohibited to buy links, build BPNs or do link exchange schemes. So you are facing a penalty risk for this kind of actions. I also think buying links is a waste of money, because nobody guarantees you how that would eventually help, while you are paying upfront.

My opinion is to do some keyword research and focus on writing quality content with length above your competitors to try to rank better. Meanwhile, you can also do some manual outreach for backlinks, but don't try to buy any backlinks. You will find many people trying to trick you, pretending they offer links in exchange for 100$ - 200$.

[Cash Bonus]

Focus mainly on specific keywords and at the same time, work on the quality of your content. Content length is also another crucial factor and plays a highly important role.

[smoothwebsites]

Hi Guys,

I am trying to publish as long posts as I can. Because I have read from many sources that the more you publish, the better it ranks!

Of course, it has to be valuable content and should be all unique.

But I have noticed some well-ranked sites that they have around 500 words of content each post even less.

What do you think about that? Do you have similar observations?

Thanks in advance

Cheers!

If they answer the query successfully, then the site has done its job and so has G. Content length isn't the be all and end all.

[sakisarv]

The secret is large texts, even over 200 words, but they are quality and very useful for the user

[Moonlight Cat]

I don't think that content lenght is so important. I think that user behavior is more important. I see some articels with very long content.

For example, i would like to know, how to create big burger very quick. And get article with are lot of content about food, meat, bread, history of culinary... And somethere in this ocean of words hide answer to my question.

I hope the google logic is - information must be relevant. Sometimes one sentence may be more useful than large book.

I think the ideal is something like Wikipedia.

[daqwerty]

Without a doubt what content there is in it. I write myself, and I've had some clients asking me for articles of 2500 words, because that was their strategy. While I do think that such long articles can set you apart, it is very difficult to write a slot review with that many words. Even a Casino review gets a lot of unnecessary filling. I have also have other clients asking me to do casino reviews with only 600-800 words, and while that is easy to write, it leaves out a lot of interesting information.

I think the longer the better, IF, you manage to get good and relevant information. 1000-1500 words for casino reviews is both compact and detailed enough according to my experience.

[pb.network]

Hi Guys,

I am trying to publish as long posts as I can. Because I have read from many sources that the more you publish, the better it ranks!

Of course, it has to be valuable content and should be all unique.

But I have noticed some well-ranked sites that they have around 500 words of content each post even less.

What do you think about that? Do you have similar observations?

Thanks in advance

Cheers!

As I said in the other topic it's not the quantity you publish, it's the quality. As for the lenght of the post - my researches and tests show that articles of 1000+ words rank best. Longer articles are the best way to talk about a topic and everything related to it and using your main keywords.
Spamming with just unique content may be OK for 2010 when it was fine to spam with lots of links and crappy content. Now the search engines really check the content you publish and that reflects on the site authority immediately.

[casinowinners]

Most things in SEO (including content length) have to do with adopting the user's perspective and focusing on user experience first. Google is all about user experience as it's widely known. So, think of it this way. If user experience is at the forefront and users crave to know about a subject in depth without having to navigate through several different articles to get a full answer to their questions, would a 500 word article suffice to offer them what they want? Probably not, right?

Another point adopted by an entirely SEO perspective is that when you write a piece you want to target certain keywords. But you're not just going for one keyword. You do have your main keyword but you want to include several different variations of that. It's very difficult to do that in a 500 word piece, and yet make the text look natural and not keyword stuffed.

So, I'd say a rule of thumb would be anything between 1200-2000 word articles. Of course, that depends on the industry, topic and several other factors, but that word count would be a good starting point.

[cryptocasinoscc]

Most things in SEO (including content length) have to do with adopting the user's perspective and focusing on user experience first. Google is all about user experience as it's widely known. So, think of it this way. If user experience is at the forefront and users crave to know about a subject in depth without having to navigate through several different articles to get a full answer to their questions, would a 500 word article suffice to offer them what they want? Probably not, right?

I agree. Thanks for the points.

Cheers & Have an awesome NEW YEAR!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[casinobosscanada]

Do articles with higher amount of words rank better? Whats optimum number of words for article?

[Karri]

When I started writing slot reviews the average length was somewhere around 1000 words. Nowadays it has dropped to around 500 words. If you are looking for quality that is about 200 - 300 words too many; it's just a lot of repetition, keywords, and fillers. No wonder most people read by skimming the text these days. Most sites optimise content for search engines and not for the reader; which does probably give better results but is not exactly what I would consider quality. I used to write in Finnish and the same requirements applied there, even though Finnish is such a different language that you'd have up to 70% fewer words even when translating. Pains me to read those texts these days, it's just garbage for Google to gobble up.

[SearchEngineWings]

Not always the size of the content matters, but sometimes the topic and the quality of the post play an important role to get more engaged to your website. So that's why some time small size post also rank very well in the search engine.

[thomasandreas]

it is about content quality, and how well you cover the topic. If you can cover the topic well in 500 words then 500 words is ok. If you cannot, and you need 750 words to cover the topic. then dont slack, but write the required amount