help needed

[casinobonuseslisting]

my website: http://www.casinobonuseslisting.com
when the website initially started, my website was doing good in terms of website grade. i was checking my website grade at
http://websitegrader.com/
in its initial stages website grade was increasing and indexed pages were increasing as well and website grade reached to 90. but suddenly it started decreasing and indexed pages started decreasing again. today i just found that number of indexed pages are N/A and website grade has dropped to 73.

[universal4]

How has traffic been?

How are you doing in Google?

Maybe ignore this "rating" site you are putting so much effort in to and study analytics or some of the other more well known ranking methods or sites.

I just did a quick search for casino bonuses listing and see you at #3 in Google, so ignoring that "rating" site I think you are doing ok.

I am not sure what other keywords you might be targeting, or how old the site is or some other factors, but I have not heard of the web site grader before so you may be doing better than you think.

Rick
Universal4

[casinobonuseslisting]

i just checked again my website for indexed pages and i am glad that number of indexed pages are back and website grade is back as well. actually i wasnt concerned about website grading, i was concerned about number of indexed pages.

[davemerry]

Glad to hear the problem has been resolved.

On a side note, I find Website Grader quite a useful tool to get a quick overview of a website. Although as Rick said it shouldn't be used as a metric of success.

[Nile Hadwards]

I think you did not do regularly submission. And if you are doing doing this thing it may be you are doing in nofollow links.

[best.hands]

Sometimes tools can get you off the track, especially when you are unaware of the malfunction. There's a lot you can use to check your site's statistic, so try using a number of them and compare, not totally relying on what one has to say.

[WinYourWayKyle]

I would like to mention as well that websitegrader is extremely inconsistent.... I can run the algorythm them use 3 times in a row and get different results each time.... So keep that in mind as well.

[JoeAdams]

<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><title></title><meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 3.2 (Win32)"><style type="text/css"> <!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --> </style> Yeah right, I agree with best.hands, sometimes tools are not that reliable and often times, using the manual way is much more reliable.