Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21
    universal4's Avatar
    universal4 is offline Forum Administrator
    Join Date
    July 2003
    Location
    Courage is being scared to death...and saddling up anyway. John Wayne
    Posts
    29,691
    Thanks
    2,791
    Thanked 8,282 Times in 5,246 Posts

    Default

    Originally you claimed to have proof that iAffiliates stated you could incentivise players for their casino.
    Where is this proof?

    Then you claim you didn't incentivise players for Mansion casino, but admit to doing it for other properties.

    If Mansion is disallowing you a comission based upon your actions with another casino, then yes, I would be on your side that you should be due the commission on those 2 players you sent, but I would also fully support them either closing your account or switching you to a rev-share only account moving forward (based upon your actions with other groups).

    Now if Mansion has proof the 2 players you sent are directly connected to you, such as address, last name, ip address etc, that also would be a basis to deny the payment. I agree with Shay on this one, they can not use the "if you did it to others" in this case.

    If I could spare the extra $150 I would just give it to Mansion, ask them to use it to pay you and suggest they switch you to a rev-share account and solve the issue for both you and them.

    =====
    And you consistiently claim any proof you posted is being canceled, or deleted and I can assure you and anyone else reading this thread, NOTHING is being deleted, and each time you are asked for proof you say you have posted it and it's being deleted, although it isn't.

    One thing I did notice is that attempted to post from a different username, and if you would read our rules here, that is something we do NOT allow. We kindly ask you use the one and only account here and I apologize for not catching that previously.

    Rick
    Universal4
    Gambling World Online Roulette Online Blackjack Live Online Games Sports Betting Horse Racing
    Casino Affiliate Programs
    Hosting and Domain Names
    Gambling Industry Association
    GPWA Moderation by Me and My Big Bad Security Self
    If an affiliate program is not small affiliate friendly (especially small US Affiliate), then they are NOT Affiliate Friendly!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to universal4 For This Useful Post:

    -Shay- (30 March 2013)

  3. #22
    snello90 is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    March 2013
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by universal4 View Post
    Originally you claimed to have proof that iAffiliates stated you could incentivise players for their casino.
    Where is this proof?

    Then you claim you didn't incentivise players for Mansion casino, but admit to doing it for other properties.

    If Mansion is disallowing you a comission based upon your actions with another casino, then yes, I would be on your side that you should be due the commission on those 2 players you sent, but I would also fully support them either closing your account or switching you to a rev-share only account moving forward (based upon your actions with other groups).

    Now if Mansion has proof the 2 players you sent are directly connected to you, such as address, last name, ip address etc, that also would be a basis to deny the payment. I agree with Shay on this one, they can not use the "if you did it to others" in this case.

    If I could spare the extra $150 I would just give it to Mansion, ask them to use it to pay you and suggest they switch you to a rev-share account and solve the issue for both you and them.

    =====
    And you consistiently claim any proof you posted is being canceled, or deleted and I can assure you and anyone else reading this thread, NOTHING is being deleted, and each time you are asked for proof you say you have posted it and it's being deleted, although it isn't.

    One thing I did notice is that attempted to post from a different username, and if you would read our rules here, that is something we do NOT allow. We kindly ask you use the one and only account here and I apologize for not catching that previously.

    Rick
    Universal4
    no,u have no understand what i have say,let me explain better!!

    first : i never say mansion told me incentive is accepted,never say that,read again and carefully previous post
    and never say i have a proof that mansion told me i can incentive,i have said i have the proof that i could incentivate mondofortuna casino (advplace network) which mansion blamed me 28 March (post up) okay??
    so i never incentivate mansion's casiṇ! never !

    i work with advplace network,and in february,they add an offer(mondofortuna casiṇ) writing that incentive WAS accepted .
    so i decide to use this opportunity,okay?
    i open that thread : http://lockerz.italia.forumfree.it/?t=64814880
    for look players to join and offer a cashback .
    incentive was accepted so i could do it without violation of terms in that network.

    if someone is interest :
    after the first player,advplace told me that the incentive was no more accepted,and i stop replying in this topic,and stop to enroll players(well only one was enroll,withou cpa too) okay?
    you can read all that if u go to this forum topic .


    mansion just not believe me,even if i put the proof!!
    i guess they think : "if you did it to others you did to us too"
    and that is not correct !
    because i never do that.
    and mansion not have proofs about i have incentived with their,because is never appened,i no incentive mansion.

    mansion I'm here
    if you want to show EVERYONE a real post we are here, otherwise be the good network that people say and pay me for the traffic i have generated !!

    but,they are just disappeared,no answer in email,and no answer here.



    @universal4

    yes,u right,i have open another account(very similar username)
    because my account was blocked,well,every post i try to write always said it had to be approved before accepted .
    it's not the true? say truth please we are tryng to explain all
    i know was wrong,but also does not allow me to defend myself was very unpleasant(because I was accused for something ive never do and could not defend myself)
    so i ask sorry for that ! but i was very mad at this moment

    well,when i put the proof,the image,first time was removed.
    i don't say lies.it's the truth!
    i don't know how forum's work,if backup is possible,if deleted things are saved somewhere,but check,i m not sayng lies
    Last edited by snello90; 1 April 2013 at 4:29 pm.

  4. #23
    universal4's Avatar
    universal4 is offline Forum Administrator
    Join Date
    July 2003
    Location
    Courage is being scared to death...and saddling up anyway. John Wayne
    Posts
    29,691
    Thanks
    2,791
    Thanked 8,282 Times in 5,246 Posts

    Default

    OK, if your account was blocked, just creating a new account is not acceptable ever.....the first account will stay blocked and we ask you to continue to use your current account.

    Posting proof about an affiliate program that has nothing to do with Mansion shouldn't really come into play in this discussion, and does nothing but confuse the issue and the point you are trying to make.

    I think I have a little better handle on what has transpired here, and to be honest, I think how excited you got as well as confusing the situation bringing an unrelated affiliate program into the mix made getting your point accross a little tougher.

    I agree with Mansion that they probably do NOT want this kind of traffic, and I do NOT blame them for not accepting CPA traffic from you (based upon your history). I know this is a little biased, but I would not blame them for switching you to a rev-share only.

    If you prove you have high quality traffic, switching you back to CPA later could be a possible arrangement if they were willing.

    I do tend to lean on you side for the original traffic you sent though and I hinestly think they should pay you CPA on those players since they did in fact agree tot he cpa terms.

    Now if they have additional proof of collsion, or direct ties with those players, then they have a case, but the way the story kept changing it does appear they should pay, or produce such proof.

    Rick
    Universal4
    Gambling World Online Roulette Online Blackjack Live Online Games Sports Betting Horse Racing
    Casino Affiliate Programs
    Hosting and Domain Names
    Gambling Industry Association
    GPWA Moderation by Me and My Big Bad Security Self
    If an affiliate program is not small affiliate friendly (especially small US Affiliate), then they are NOT Affiliate Friendly!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to universal4 For This Useful Post:

    -Shay- (1 April 2013)

  6. #24
    snello90 is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    March 2013
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Well, keep in mind that mansion has add this factr about another affiliation !
    i had to do?
    not defend?
    i just explain the facts correctly!

    and yes the fact was deposit 20$ cpa 70$ .
    those was the terms.
    without incentive.
    i had never incentive,
    If mansion claims to the contrary at least do it with a REAL PROOF !


    and of course i think like you,mansion and every casiṇ,incentive never shd be good traffic!

    but gpwa should not protect the affiliates of its casino sponsor?
    well,i can't see still any real proof about my incentive in mansion casino's.
    they are just disappear.
    gpwa please investigate about that !!
    thank yu very much
    i guess now mansion is disappear for me,but i hope someone investigate and
    prevent these things happen with other publishers

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •