Joomsport

[chaumi]

Anyone ever used this?

Creates pages with players, teams, stadiums, match results etc.

Useful to a point (or may be for some users).

But...I have a worry that (if indexed) it would be seen as thin content. That's a lot of thin content pages across a site and theoretically could hit a threshold marker (if such a thing really exists and/or depending on what the 'threshold' really is). + if it is seen as thin, then many pages will make their way on to GSC error reports.

+ ofc, out of the box it's duplicate content. All sites using it will have the same info.

+ even if it's indexed, it'll never rank. Plenty of competition who are hand writing their stuff (in a good way).

I'll be looking at how/if it's possible to insert your own content to overcome this. Might be doable with a lot of effort. Or alternatively I tell G to noindex everything, so it's still there for users.

Any views?

[codexman]

Well, maybe by CAREFULLY using AI you can enrich "thin" looking pages with more content. Key is CAREFULLY. But why not - give it a shot!

[chaumi]

you can enrich "thin" looking pages with more content.

Yeah having looked deeper it's actually easy to add content to individual teams, players, grounds, etc. But whether I use AI for that or the alternative(s) it's still a bunch of work for (what is possibly) no return.

I can't see any pages ranking (for any site) that appear to be using Joomsport (admittedly with little effort put into it). Which (most likely) means either I'm missing them, none of them have done anything to enhance the basic stats, or they just don't rank. Or no one else ever uses Joomsport!

Would be great if anyone that has or does use it could give any confirmation if they've ever ranked a page (for some sort of 'proper' search term and anywhere in the visible index).