
Originally Posted by
RacingJim
Am I being too cynical in thinking this could be a business decision in order to make more profit?
I do very noticeably poorer on William Hill than any other major bookie, why could this be? I don't trust the software, I think lots of players probably just get de-tagged or never tagged in the first place.
As for trying to find banners in the back-end, that takes me 3-4 times as long on William Hill and it takes aaages to find the correct landing page, several times with this software I have just given up after 30-45 mins of searching as I can't find the correct creative.
So it sucks from a user-friendly point of view and it sucks from a trust point of view. Are William Hill really so much worse a performer in terms of daily signups than Bet365, Coral, Betfred, Ladbrokes etc based on similar traffic numbers to each offer?
This change sucks big time Ladbrokes, this is a very affiliate-unfriendly move, but maybe that's the point?