Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39
  1. #1
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default Live blogging the Indian Affairs hearing on online poker

    Another day, another hearing in Washington D.C. about online poker. Today's hearing kicks off at 2:15 EST and will be held in the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. The topic? The impact of regulated online poker on Indian tribes.

    Here's the witness list:

    Panel # 1

    Mr. Larry S. Roberts
    General Counsel
    National Indian Gaming Commission, Washington, DC

    Panel # 2

    The Honorable Bruce Bozsum
    Chairman
    The Mohegan Tribe, Uncasville, CT

    The Honorable Glen Gobin
    Vice Chairman
    Tulalip Tribes, Tulalip, WA

    Panel # 3

    Mr. Ernie Stevens
    Chairman
    National Indian Gaming Association, Washington, DC

    Accompanied by Mr. Mark Van Norman
    Senior Advisor
    National Indian Gaming Association, Washington, DC

    Mr. Alfonse D'Amato
    Chairman
    Poker Players Alliance, Washington, DC

    Accompanied by Mr. John Pappas
    Executive Director
    Poker Players Alliance, Washington, DC

    Ms. Penny Coleman
    Principal
    Coleman Indian Law, Washington, DC

    Mr. Grant W. Eve
    CPA, CFE, Manager
    Joseph Eve, Great Falls, MT
    I'll be live-blogging the event in this thread. If you'd like to watch the hearing yourself, the website below should have a live webcast when the festivities kick off. Vin Narayanan will also be live-Tweeting the event here: @CasinoCityVin. He's already published a few Tweets on what to expect this afternoon.

    http://indian.senate.gov/hearings/he...d258d9b32cb5d8

  2. #2
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Hearing kicks off about five minutes late. And it looks like we have our first freeze of the live broadcast.

  3. #3
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Still issues with the live feed. While we wait, here's the testimony of PPA Chairman Sen. Al D'Amato:

    http://theppa.org/ppa/2011/11/17/alf...ring-11172011/

  4. #4
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Not a good sign when the most powerful country in the world has bandwidth problems. When/if the live feed comes back, we'll be here.

  5. #5
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    The feed is back, and Sen. Al Franken (of SNL fame) is talking.

  6. #6
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Franken asking Mr. Larry S. Roberts, General Counsel National Indian Gaming Commission, if Indian tribes are weary of online gaming.

    Roberts says some tribes are in favor, some or not. NIGC won't take a position on whether there's a benefit. They're worried about regulation.
    Last edited by GPWA Dan; 17 November 2011 at 1:48 pm.

  7. #7
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Roberts says it's hard to layout how an online gaming bill would affect IGRA because there's no bill out there right now.

  8. #8
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Roberts harping on there not being any specific legislation out there right now, so it's tough to define the role the NIGC will play in online gaming regulation.

  9. #9
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Question on whether online poker has benefited online poker Indian tribes.

    Roberts sidesteps the question again. He's not saying much of anything, except for "Thank you (insert senator name)." Keeps saying NIGC are regulators.

  10. #10
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Roberts doesn't believe the NIGC will ever take a position on online gaming. He perks up when asked if there's adequate regulation in land-based Indian gaming regulation.

  11. #11
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Roberts is done with his testimony, Mohegan Sun Tribe Chairman Bruce Bozsum is next.

    Internet gaming is of "critical importance" to the Mohegan Sun Tribe, he says. Technology of online gaming presents "opportunity and challenge." Hopeful that cooperation in the online gaming debate will continue.

  12. #12
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Bozsum: Any online gaming law should protect tribal rights. All tribes to compete on fair and level playing field. "Indian tribes can compete and be as successful as anyone else."

    His recommendations:

    No head starts for other states, including Nevada and N.J. Tribes should be included in every step of the regulation process. Tribal governments should be authorized to operate online gaming sites on "level playing field." Allow wagers to be placed on non-tribal lands. Strictly enforce shutdowns of non-regulated sites. Introduce poker in phase 1.

  13. #13
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    The Honorable Glen Gobin, Vice Chairman of the Tulalip Tribes in Washington State, is up next.

    Gobin sees online gaming is "direct threat." Doesn't support the legalization of the activity.

  14. #14
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Gobin is discussing the history of the Tulalip, and the positive developments that have occurred because of land-based Indian gaming.

    Online gaming comes "as a risk" to tribal Indian communities. Says Indian gaming will provide over $260 billion in 10 years, compared to the $41 billion in online gaming.

    If legislation does come forward, Gobin wants an open process.

  15. #15
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Bozsum says Indian tribes can both operate and regulate online gambling. Tribes do have the technology and experience to regulate themselves and work with other organizations.

  16. #16
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Gobin says tribes "need a seat at the table" with knowledgeable people partaking.

    Bozsum says Mohegan is prepared for either federal or state-by-state legislation. Prefers federal because there's one set of rules to follow. State-by-state "will complicate things." Federal solution would have better liquidity as well.

  17. #17
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Gobin says some tribes are better positioned to take advantage of Internet gaming than other tribes. Bozsum says that there's no limit or no advantage to certain tribes if online gaming is federally legalized.

  18. #18
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Gobin worried about name-recognition for his tribe against Harrah's and other major casino companies. I assume he means Caesars Entertainment, Harrah's new name.

    Bozsum says if "you're not at the table for dinner, you'll be dinner." Insisting that Indian tribes need a seat at the online gaming regulation discussion.

  19. #19
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Bozsum doesn't think all commercial businesses are ready to pull the trigger on Internet gaming. Believes it will be fair across the board. Believes if tribes band together, coalition could be bigger than Caesars.

    Gobin says when talking about "benefits" of regulation, people are hoping for best-case scenarios. Revenue projections for poker-only are significantly less than all casino games.

  20. #20
    GPWA Dan is offline Former Staff Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Third panel is up now. NIGA, PPA, Coleman Indian Law representatives to speak.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •