Member Focus

[Roulette Zeitung]

Status report

Profanity filter obviously installed and active.
Don't wonder about the ****'s in your posts.
It's not, because you have a knot in your tongue.
It's because of the filter.
We all swear like troopers when the cameras are off.
Here, the cameras are on, so it's o.k., and everyone still clearly understands, what the heck is meant by that ****'s in your lines.
Now your anger will receive even more attention, because **** is an eye catcher, when someone is scrolling down posts.
He will stop.
So your posts will be read more.
Wait!
Here my statement to CCM Department for Whiskey, Women and Legal Affairs: "This is no call to produce now thousands of ****'s, o.k.?!"

Leopold

[-Shay-]

Conclusion - we can say ****, ass, asshole, bullshit. We cannot say ****, *****, *****, ******* or ****

[Roulette Zeitung]

Oh my Goodness!
I don't even want to imagine which words you used for your test

Made for the first time also a test now.
With F-word, N-word, filter is working very good.

Fortunately, "Hillary", "Slick Willy", "Cigars" and "Oral Office" are not effected by filters like on other places on the wonderful internet.
This is very important for my continuing reporting here on GPWA.

Fernanda is happy, because her fighter name is no longer "Bixxx Fraudnanda".
It's now "***** Fraudnanda".
That means, a 5 star fraudster.

But thanks to your ******* post, now I know at least 4 ******* words that are in the **** filter very soon if this thread will be read by the higher levels.

If there is any ************ in the audience, who believes, he is alone with his tingling hands while reading this **** ... no you aren't.

I wish you all a wonderful evening.

*******

[-Shay-]

I'm pretty sure that if we try hard enough, we can find some pretty ***** clever ways to be this b!tch of a filter. Or perhaps it anticipates our moves. I'll press the reply button and see.

[Roulette Zeitung]

"I'll press the reply button and see."

No, no Shay!!!!
Hit the report button instead!

It's so delicious!
My shopping tip for today: Dornfelder, sweet red wine from Germany.
One bottle Euro 5,90!
I only drink 12 - 28 days every year.
So, one bottle is enough to me ... and certainly for today!

Now you know, dear audience, why this is here a 73,000+ views thread and not a 30 self made clicks nonstarter. It's about breasts, the backside, about alcohol, dispute, cuddles and also about Fernanda now.
She's omnipresent!

Now a message to you, the wonderful audience:
OH, Leopold this arrogant ************ coming out of his village cave?!
Since I moved to this new ******* home, I already lost two dogs in less than half a year.
One due to a too fast car from an idiot and one due to the age and an illness.
Not a good start, right?!
So we have now three dogs and three cats left.
And if you really believe, I care about of this 100% negative, humorless, uneducated and superficial ****, that is almost 25% of the the whole forum content, then you called the wrong telephone number.

I am still believing, that Germany, my country, must still be the country of poets and thinkers, and every evening, when I see this CNN liars and others from the same kind, this hate, proven simply fabricated fake news, with intent, I cannot understand, how this is possible. It is so unfair, and this unfairness for me is the most bad thing. This is not America. This is a deep state Coup d'état.

It's war on America.
Inside America.

Leopold

[universal4]

There is zero logical reason to try and circumvent the filter.

Rick
Universal4

[Progger]

There is zero logical reason to try and circumvent the filter.

Rick
Universal4

Freedom to Speech/Write....

[universal4]

Yes, but that is still no excuse or reason to try and circumvent a banned word filter.

Rick
Universal4

[-Shay-]

There is zero logical reason to try and circumvent the filter.

Rick
Universal4

Logically speaking, I want to make sure that the filter works the way you guys intend for it to work since you have it in place. I'd argue that logically speaking, there's no need for a filter.

[Scampi]

We are all adults here, why block words? If I want to say a program is ****, why is it filtered?

[-Shay-]

We are all adults here, why block words? If I want to say a program is ****, why is it filtered?

Filtering descriptive words automatically is $h!t in my opinion.

[Roulette Zeitung]

I am sorry, but this filter is really a failure and now really close to censorship!
Why?

By chance I found out, that a word, that not even is filtered by conservative U.S. news organisations, is filtered here!

Also FOX news, a strong conservative news program, is using this word in a headline of an important article:

Title of the article: "Graham says keep 'crazy bastards' at Guantanamo Bay"

===> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...n-centers.html

So now this filter (accidentally?) indeed can be described as censorship, because it's impossible to quote e.g. a title of FOX news if the word bastards is not written as plural but singular.

In my opinion, it is no coincidence, that the B-Word with respect to the serious criminal Fernanda is also in the filter ... because I used it 90+% in this forum, and only for a satire fighting name. Once again, satire is censored and a serious criminal is now happy.

Also a word, that will be used by Fox News many times:

"Critics Slam ABC Pilot 'Good Christian Bitches' for 'Inappropriate,' 'Damaging' Title"

===> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...ing-title.html

And now try "bastards" and "bitches" with singular.

You'll get this result: ******* *****

I used in my lucid diary the singular of "bastards", that is filtered, only in connection of radical islamic terrorists who killed people after terror attacks. My opinion, that a radical islamic terrorist is the (singular of "bastards") will be censored, even if also FOX News has no problem with such a word. This is really not good. And moreover, it happened behind our back. This is really worse, or missed I a thread with the announcement of such a filter?

As every "filtering" tool it has a glitch to debunk it.
In this case, whoever filled the filter, the glitch is, they simply forgot to add the plural!

Fighters for an uncensored world like me, are happy about this, because at least radical islamic mass murderers should not have a protection here, right?
Yes, filtering a word, that is not even censored by news organizations with respect to mass murderers, is a protection.

With this post I want only make clear one simple thing: This filter simply goes to far and is so already out of control, because any person of GPWA or CCM can add words as he likes behind the back of the users.

What's coming next into the filter?
This is the question, everyone, who is smart, will ask her-/himself, with good reasons.

And now one from GPWA/CCM has the chance to put the plural of both B-words also into the filter and with that officially to censor worldwide available FOX NEWS headline titles ... worldwide available ... with the exception of GPWA then in this case!

Or simply to think again over the filter, which is no fault, because a "I have the power, I am right, there is no turning back. Period!" philosophy is not, what the people in a forum are searching for.

And without the people a forum would be nothing.

Leopold

[universal4]

No, removing words that most folks would never use in regular conversations with their mother's or grandmothers is NOT censorship but responsible forum moderation.

We have already seen cases where individuals have even changed the spelling of such words, just to circumvent the filter, and that is not responsible posting, but using the words for no other reason than to see what can be posted.

The GPWA is a group of professional webmasters and affiliates, as well as Program and property representatives, and there is no reason certain words have to be used.

Rick
Universal4

[-Shay-]

No, removing words that most folks would never use in regular conversations with their mother's or grandmothers is NOT censorship but responsible forum moderation.

We have already seen cases where individuals have even changed the spelling of such words, just to circumvent the filter, and that is not responsible posting, but using the words for no other reason than to see what can be posted.

The GPWA is a group of professional webmasters and affiliates, as well as Program and property representatives, and there is no reason certain words have to be used.

Rick
Universal4

If there's no reason these "certain words" need used, then why would the filter be put into place?

[Progger]

i would prefer some other "updates"...ssl and a mobile design - because its still impossible to use this forum on a phone...

The filter will not stop me...


Regards

[universal4]

If there's no reason these "certain words" need used, then why would the filter be put into place?

Then why use words you would not use in conversations with your grandmother or in front of grade school children?

The filter is in place to remove such words that really have no need to be here to start with.

Rick
Universal4

[Roulette Zeitung]

I understand. Grandmothers and grade school children from the U.S. should be banned from reading FOX news and radical islamic terrorists are no longer bastards, despite the fact, they are and this fact is not only my opinion but also the opinion of U.S. Senators and billions of people worldwide.

Happy New Year, dear filter!

By the way: Will **** ******* *** ***** ***** ************ *** added to the monthly algorithm, for the count?

Leopold

[Roulette Zeitung]

+++ Addendum +++

As I mentioned in my lucid diary some minutes ago, the "filter" is also censoring William Shakespeare!

This is really weird.

Leopold

[Progger]

The new filter force me to use bad words in every post...

Some words are new for me...but I will remember it

Regards

[-Shay-]

Then why use words you would not use in conversations with your grandmother or in front of grade school children?

The filter is in place to remove such words that really have no need to be here to start with.

Rick
Universal4

I'm pretty sure that we can agree that grandmothers are probably not this "professional forum's" target audience and if we can't agree to that, I am absolutely certain that grade school children are definitely not the target audience here. With that in mind, there's no need to protect the kids.

I generally choose my words carefully. With the new filter, there's no ******* reason to be nearly as selective in my descriptive words.

Please note that I chose to type *'s rather than rely upon the filter in the above statement.