eGaming Review's Power 50 affiliates in poker.
Why do I have a feeling this is going to cause some debate?
eGaming Review's Power 50 affiliates in poker.
Why do I have a feeling this is going to cause some debate?
Jon Parker,
editor, EGRmagazine.com
The main reason it will cause debate is because its not accurate.
Many of the picks are strong contenders and possibly top 50, but the top 10 is way off for casinos and poker. This assumes the criteria is overall earnings per month/year and influence with the operators.
If you based your choices on message board visibility than I can see why you would arrive at some of the choices listed. But if its based on earnings and leverage with sponsors than the picks are incorrect.
You omitted a number of earning powerhouses and I don't think you provided enough weighting to search engine rankings.
Having spent eight years concentrating on the affiliate sector and working with the top affiliates and virtually every major operator I think I have a good perspective on who's who and that's why I decided to throw in my two cents.
Vrindavan (1 June 2010)
Rigged!!
Why am I not on that list??
Seriously, a list like this is completely subjective based on the criteria used to compile it. I think it's probably a pretty good representation based on information supplied by the AM's who were polled. Ask different AM's or programs and the list would probably be different.
Interesting read. Thanks for sharing.
Terry - The Pokerkeep
President / CEO - Gambling Affiliates Union
Casino Affiliate Programs
Affiliate Resources
Gambling Affiliate Program Blacklist
Email: admin @ thepokerkeep.com