Affiliate Enquiry

[betwithoutkyc]

My name is Dan and I recently applied for GPWA membership for our website https://betwithoutkyc.com/
BetWithoutKYC is an independent crypto casino and sportsbook comparison platform focused on no KYC and crypto friendly gambling sites for players WW
Our focus includes:
• Independent casino and sportsbook reviews
• Crypto and no KYC payment comparisons
• Transparent bonus and promotion breakdowns
• Fast payout and withdrawal information
• Responsible gambling resources and player safety
• Editorial content and rankings based on research and user experience
We are actively growing the platform and building long term partnerships within the industry and look forward to becoming part of the GPWA community.
Best regards,
Dan

[andrei-vam]

Hi Dan!
Your site looks great and loads relatively fast!
A tip from my end - no kyc keywords are hot in AU, NZ, GCC, nordics

[invinciblepoker]

your domain name is clearly designed to attract problem / excluded gamblers.

• Responsible gambling resources and player safety

lots of oxmorons.

how are players safe if they are not KYCd, and all the sites you promote are illegal.

clown

[eenzoo]

What on earth does KYC have to do with ‘player protection’ in the true sense?! Does a copy of my ID protect me from excessive gambling? Maybe in Germany, where every registration is logged to enforce unbelievably stupid rules that again have nothing to do with player protection or responsible gambling. KYC is used solely for official oversight aka AML excuses aka taxes. And no, it even promotes casinos with a Malta licence; I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that they're all illegal operators…


His real problem is his source of information, ... AI. There are simply too many errors and outdated details. He also spouts nonsense when he claims that, for example, Vulkan, Slotoro or Beef don't have any KYC measures.

[betwithoutkyc]

I get the criticism, but honestly a lot of casinos abuse KYC too.

Most sites don’t care about KYC when people deposit and lose money. Suddenly when someone wins and tries to withdraw, that’s when the documents start.

If KYC was truly about player protection, responsible gambling and safety, then it should happen before people are allowed to gamble — not only after a withdrawal request.

The point of the site isn’t to tell people to gamble irresponsibly. We mainly focus on comparing crypto casinos, payout speed, verification policies, bonuses and user experience as transparently as possible.

And yeah, some wording on the site can definitely be improved. We’re already updating parts of it to make policies and limitations clearer instead of oversimplifying “no KYC”

[dannyx]

KYC isn't great for players; I'm sure most would prefer to bet without verification.
It has nothing to do with player safety. But it does have to do with the security of the casino or bookmaker.

Unfortunately, to gain access to the best operators, you have to go through KYC, whether as a player or an affiliate.

As for the website:

Visually, I like it. It’s really nice and has a cool UX.

As for the information, I’m not sure, because many no-KYC casinos are only really like that until it’s time to cash out.
And I’m not too keen on the domain name. They could have come up with something short and cool like nokyc, kycno, or something short.
nokyc.game nokyc.bet nokyc.casino itp


I was surprised by how few searches there were for this topic; I thought a lot of people would be looking for it. I guess terms like nlicensed, no license casino itp in various languages are searched for more often.

[NoDepositCasinos]

Agree with the points raised before. KYC is rarely about player safety and often about just compliance (and that's ok, as long as everyone is an adult and knows what they are getting into). That being said, are you really sure the sites you are promoting are not using KYC from the beginning to the end? When you say "very low KYC risk", how low is that? That's something I would ask as a potential player. Finally, did you get the GPWA approval? I saw it listed on your site without the logo, but I can't find it here.

[universal4]

To clarify, the betwithkyc site has not yet received the Approved Portal Seal, and they are in the final stages of Private Member approval at this time, after which they may request a seal review.

Rick
Universal4

[Teodora B]

Hey Dan! Welcome!

I had a look at your website, and I noticed that on this page - https://betwithoutkyc.com/bookmakers, you have 2 x number 1 (see the screenshot)

[betwithoutkyc]

Hi Teodora, thank you fir thar appreciate the message, I have also sent you a message on telegram ,

[wonderpunter]

site looks good visually, But you are using tons of 2015 SEO tactics which will cause more damage than good, by that I mean your footer links like Spammy. I would just keep a few good pages there and not over do it.

[betprotips]

Looks cool but also completely vibe coded, thus the mistakes and outdated info? What is your strategy on promoting it?

[betwithoutkyc]

site looks good visually, But you are using tons of 2015 SEO tactics which will cause more damage than good, by that I mean your footer links like Spammy. I would just keep a few good pages there and not over do it.

Thanks for the feedback, really appreciate it.
You were right actually — the issue was mainly caused by the “view more” implementation on mobile/footer which ended up exposing way too many links at once and made it feel more SEO-heavy than intended.
We’ve already cleaned it up and reduced the visible links significantly to make it feel more curated and user-focused instead of showing everything at once.
Appreciate you taking the time to point it out.

[betwithoutkyc]

Looks cool but also completely vibe coded, thus the mistakes and outdated info? What is your strategy on promoting it?

Fair feedback.

The site is still pretty new and we’ve been scaling/testing fast, so a few outdated sections and inconsistencies slipped through during expansion. We’re currently going through the site manually to tighten up content quality, update outdated info and reduce the “scaled” feeling a bit.
Main focus now is:

• cleaner UX
• more curated content
• real testing/verification
• stronger country-specific information
• improving trust signals overall

Promotion-wise we’re mainly focused on:

• SEO
• Reddit/forums/community discussions
• Telegram/social traffic
• affiliate industry networking
• and building the brand gradually instead of just mass publishing pages.

Appreciate the honest feedback.

[CasinoRadarIT]

The website itself doesn't look too bad, however some of the casinos you promote, actually requires KYC verification usually, saying this for personal experience, since I tested some of those platforms.

However I think you're doing a good job, what is your strategy on promoting it?

[Teodora B]

Hey Dan! Not sure if I missed it, but I can't find it. Can you pls ping me again? Thanks!

[betwithoutkyc]

Hey Dan! Not sure if I missed it, but I can't find it. Can you pls ping me again? Thanks!

Done,

Also sent an email if you still can't see it.

Dan

[Coinchaser]

The website itself doesn't look too bad, however some of the casinos you promote, actually requires KYC verification usually, saying this for personal experience, since I tested some of those platforms.

However I think you're doing a good job, what is your strategy on promoting it?

You are right about the KYC part, and I doubt they have deposited 1$ at any of the casinos listed. So many new review sites these days who is purely relying on AI for content creation, without factualy checking or even testing the casinos that is being promoted.

Claiming a deposit/withdrawal history of 2.5 BTC on Stake.com without KYC is just larping. All users need to KYC with identity and proof of address after the KYC level 2 introduction in 2025

[betwithoutkyc]

You are right about the KYC part, and I doubt they have deposited 1$ at any of the casinos listed. So many new review sites these days who is purely relying on AI for content creation, without factualy checking or even testing the casinos that is being promoted.

Claiming a deposit/withdrawal history of 2.5 BTC on Stake.com without KYC is just larping. All users need to KYC with identity and proof of address after the KYC level 2 introduction in 2025

We’ve actually updated a lot of the wording recently because “no KYC” obviously isn’t black and white anymore. KYC can always happen depending on withdrawal size, jurisdiction, risk flags, source of funds etc.

What we focus on now is more the actual KYC risk, withdrawal speed, limits, payment methods and real user experience.

And yes, we do test the platforms ourselves continuously — deposits, withdrawals, support response, limits and general process — then update reviews as policies change.

The goal is to build something more transparent than the typical AI-generated casino review sites that just copy the same claims everywhere.

[invinciblepoker]

"actual kyc risk" <- there is none

"to build something more transparent"

slrsy.

don't try to bullshit us.
we know what you are
and you know what you are.

Get the **** outta here.