Bookmaker.com - New Poll - please vote!

[TheGooner]

Terry - I am often wrong - but I am sure that I am correct in this case.
Section 4 regarding commissions as you've reproduced also clarifies it.

Note: Affiliate is required to have a minimum of 10 active players during the previous week to withdraw/transfer their earnings.

That says it clearly to me - and DOES say HAVE instead of refer ...

=========================

Additionally ...

Bookmaker.com has a field on their initial page after login that shows "active players this week" - and that is OVERALL ACTIVE PLAYERS THIS WEEK and is what is used to determine eligibility for payout.

I do not refer 10 NEW actives most weeks - sometimes I don't do it in a month - but I have hundreds of weekly actives overall - and I am eligible for payments each week.

Take it from someone who is working with them ... the current interpretation you have stated is not accurate.

[stocks]

I think you guys are arguing different things.

The rule is you must have 10 active players the previous week to withdraw.

So if have referred 50 players in your life time and 10 of those players decide to play in the same week then you can withdraw your funds.

[thepokerkeep]

This is obviously an argument that no one is going to win. The terms clearly state you are required to refer 10 active players in the week before you request payment.

If BM meant it to say have 10 active players, that's how they should have worded it. As it stands, they can interpret it either way, much like we are doing here.

[stocks]

This is obviously an argument that no one is going to win. The terms clearly state you are required to refer 10 active players in the week before you request payment.

If BM meant it to say have 10 active players, that's how they should have worded it. As it stands, they can interpret it either way, much like we are doing here.

Dude theres no argument here your just wrong, I hate to be blunt but thats the reality. Gooner knows, Sports Investor knows, I know, I even talked to them last week on this.

Either way its still a bullshit rule

[stocks]

I'll also add as of now if you have 10 active players in a single week you'll get paid but the way the rule is worded maybe later on down the road when more affiliates start hitting the 10 number every week they'll start to enforce it the way its written. I mean who's to say they dont pull the same **** over again same as they did when they started with this 10 player deal.

[hazo]

I agree with Gooner and Sports Investor.

I think it's a smart business move for both the program and the affiliate.

Now all the shithole websites can't promote them and spam up the SEs so the affiliates that actually do work hrd with them, get rewarded.

[thepokerkeep]

I'll also add as of now if you have 10 active players in a single week you'll get paid but the way the rule is worded maybe later on down the road when more affiliates start hitting the 10 number every week they'll start to enforce it the way its written. I mean who's to say they dont pull the same **** over again same as they did when they started with this 10 player deal.

Dude - How can I be wrong when you just said the same thing I've been saying all along?

Using the word refer in that clause gives them the out - period! I'm not wrong!

[stocks]

Dude - How can I be wrong when you just said the same thing I've been saying all along?

Using the word refer in that clause gives them the out - period! I'm not wrong!

Ok sorry I see what your saying I think the confusion here was we were saying people will currently get paid if they have 10 active players in a week but yes I agree aswell the wording gives them an out if they decide to be real pricks in the future.

[maliububarbosa]

I need to thank you for allowing me the chance to bring this issue forth. I also what to thank all who have already voted as it is still holding 100%.

[felku]

In my little time in this business I didn't like my relation to bookmaker and stopped sending them traffic. But thats me and I have only a few months in this market so I'm a newbi. The only thing that I have to say is that I find to be wrong making a minimum of active players in a week. There can be a situation were I only have 4 active players but those 4 player bet a lot of money and have more than 10 active players that only bet a little of money.

[xecutable]

Forget about the 10 players quota, does anyone remember that they closed down their Poker affiliate program? Sites entirely related to poker, with hundreds of active players most like suffered a lot.

Now I understand that someone that's currently making good money with them, would back them up, and I respect your opinion, just don't recommended to new affiliates, as they won't ever reach your success with the current conditions.