Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    gil.langelaan's Avatar
    gil.langelaan is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2018
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 308 Times in 244 Posts

    Default rel="sponsored" What do you think?

    I've just read the article: https:// www. seroundtable. com/ bloggers-dofollow-backlinks-google-guidelines-30771.html
    And it says "Of course, if you're kind of-- if these links do not pass PageRank, if they have the nofollow attached to it or rel="sponsored" attached to it, then that can be fine. That's essentially a way of advertising your website. It doesn't pass any value to your website. But it still helps users to find your content and kind of indirectly helps to promote your content and your website. So maybe that helps a little bit."

    So the question is, does it mean that backlinks rel="sponsored" are not important for SEO at all? What do you think?

  2. #2
    Sherlock's Avatar
    Sherlock is online now Public Member
    Join Date
    December 2013
    Location
    WC
    Posts
    4,949
    Thanks
    1,410
    Thanked 3,811 Times in 2,154 Posts

    Default

    I changed some on my websites. I think it is the same as nofollow for webmasters, but it is useful for Google data mining (like they will know even more which domains are being used for marketing, because webmasters flag those for free). Just my impression. I will keep using nofollow for everything.
    If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Sherlock For This Useful Post:

    gil.langelaan (19 January 2021)

  4. #3
    chaumi is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2013
    Location
    East Midlands
    Posts
    1,640
    Thanks
    570
    Thanked 840 Times in 617 Posts

    Default

    use rel="sponsored" and you are essentially telling Google you may be/are taking sponsored content, and therefore telling them you (might) sell links in that content.

    I'd suggest a potential shot in the foot, unless anyone can put a better light on it.

  5. #4
    TheGooner's Avatar
    TheGooner is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    4,563
    Thanks
    2,092
    Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,175 Posts

    Default

    As I understand it rel="sponsored" is to be used for links to commercial products.
    I use them for links to affiliate programs.

    Here is a MOZ article I just found - it's position is how I understood the situation.
    https://moz.com/blog/nofollow-sponsored-ugc

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheGooner For This Useful Post:

    gil.langelaan (19 January 2021), universal4 (18 January 2021)

  7. #5
    Sherlock's Avatar
    Sherlock is online now Public Member
    Join Date
    December 2013
    Location
    WC
    Posts
    4,949
    Thanks
    1,410
    Thanked 3,811 Times in 2,154 Posts

    Default

    Yes that is really how it has to be used. But I did not see nor benefits or penalties when using instead of nofollow. Probably good to use on new affiliate materials, but no need to change on old. At least that is what I will do.
    If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Sherlock For This Useful Post:

    TheGooner (19 January 2021)

  9. #6
    gil.langelaan's Avatar
    gil.langelaan is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2018
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 308 Times in 244 Posts

    Default

    Thanks for sharing your opinions, guys!

    Personally I try to avoid rel='sponsored' while doing guest posts but still have question is it hurt backlink profile or it's just not important at all?

  10. #7
    PROFRBcom's Avatar
    PROFRBcom is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    April 2013
    Posts
    2,173
    Thanks
    1,511
    Thanked 1,243 Times in 808 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGooner View Post
    As I understand it rel="sponsored" is to be used for links to commercial products.
    I use them for links to affiliate programs.

    Here is a MOZ article I just found - it's position is how I understood the situation.
    https://moz.com/blog/nofollow-sponsored-ugc
    Your understanding of how it is supposed to be used is similar to mine. However, we have not adopted any of the new changes and only utilize nofollow or no tag at all.

    I assume you would have said as much if so, but in case you did not, I would like to know if you noticed any changes in your metrics/rankings/traffic/etc when you made the change to swap over affiliate referral links from nofollow to sponsored?

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to PROFRBcom For This Useful Post:

    TheGooner (19 January 2021)

  12. #8
    TheGooner's Avatar
    TheGooner is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    4,563
    Thanks
    2,092
    Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,175 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PROFRBcom View Post
    I would like to know if you noticed any changes in your metrics/rankings/traffic/etc when you made the change to swap over affiliate referral links from nofollow to sponsored?
    I've probably only done 50-75% of the affiliate links as rel="sponsored" so far, just doing them as I work through them in daily activities.

    I don't expect anything to change much - it's hardly groundbreaking to go from nofllow to sponsored - although perhaps it does signal that my site is active / updated / using current markup? Traffic has not changed markedly.

    I don't monitor metrics and rankings.

  13. #9
    Sherlock's Avatar
    Sherlock is online now Public Member
    Join Date
    December 2013
    Location
    WC
    Posts
    4,949
    Thanks
    1,410
    Thanked 3,811 Times in 2,154 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gil.langelaan View Post
    Thanks for sharing your opinions, guys!

    Personally I try to avoid rel='sponsored' while doing guest posts but still have question is it hurt backlink profile or it's just not important at all?
    I do not understand what do you mean by "hurt backling profile". Indeed an ad link out, that is not marked somehow and looks like a normal link, can hurt your SERP/domain. If it really will, that idk.
    If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Sherlock For This Useful Post:

    gil.langelaan (20 January 2021)

  15. #10
    gil.langelaan's Avatar
    gil.langelaan is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2018
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 308 Times in 244 Posts

    Default

    Thanks for your responses!

    My personal opinion as affiliate website SEO manger to avoid using sponsored links to show google that my casino reviews are good and lots of websites find them an attractive and trusted source to get new info. So they refer to these articles because of great content.

  16. #11
    por's Avatar
    por
    por is offline New Member
    Join Date
    February 2021
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    For my personal opinion Which I think that in the case of Guest-Post is not good for your site google look like buy Link

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •