
Originally Posted by
universal4
In my opinion, what is unreasonable, is any demand that a US Based affiliate must have an "offshore" presence in any way in order to be paid.
Oh my god. Yes. That is 100% true. Affiliates from any country should be paid in full always and the **** as Score affiliates did should warn all. No arguing about that!
On the other side if I were affiliate almost from any country except UK, I would consider paying few hundreds/year for offshore company, only for the very reason that you do not know what the affiliate programmes or governments will do in future. (Not to mention the benefits about privacy and lower taxes) It is simple and elegant solution. It should not be "must have" solution. It is an option that saves time, nerves and money.
What I understood about US law is that if you are under revenue share, you are not just some advertisement partner, you are something more like casino operator partner and therefore you should have licence as well. Bet365 lawyers are always very active. Maybe this can be the reason behind their reluctance. I really hope this will not spread from USA like other ugly digital nonsenses.
If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.