You couldn't make this up. Our friend Mr. Bailey is now blaming the GRA, the regulator:
I've been discussing this with Aaron, and this whole process has been very disappointing. I'm considering knocking the GRA down to the level of Malta and Curacao in the CM rating system.
So: BetFred, which he recommends as an excellent casino, cheated its players. The GRA is not exactly emerging as anything like on the ball, but they are only the regulator. They are not the casino, they didn't cheat anyone. Bailey, and the BetFred AFFILIATE MANAGER who answers for the cheating casino, are angry that a body that is not guilty of any wrongdoing other than being useless (regulator standard) is at fault for not issuing findings, and as such Bailey wants to rogue them. Remember, the body that didn't actually do anything wrong. But he's quite happy to go on recommending the casino that did the cheating. And Aaron is also cross. At the regulator. Apparently he is also not cross at his casino that cheated.
This is like harbouring a criminal, supporting him and lauding him as excellent, but blaming the police for not finding him.
Can anyone credit the topsy turvy world this man lives in? I truly could not believe that when I read it: blame the regulator for doing nothing exactly unregulatorish, but don't blame the casino for cheating. Rather, recommend them as excellent.
Of course, Bailey makes no money out of the GRA. He makes money with BetFred. Therein obviously enough lies the answer, but this is beyond a charade at this point.
Really, it's all the GRA's fault. Not BeFred. Not GTech / Spielo.
Honestly, I give up.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

